On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 08:25:14PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> And looking more at that, I'm actually starting to think this is an
> XFS locking problem. XFS really should not call back to splice while
> holding the inode lock.
>
> But that XFS code doesn't seem new either. Is XFS a new thing for you
> to test with?
I started pounding on it fairly recently and have shook out a number
of bugs (now fixed) since I started, so relatively new, but on the order of
'months' now.
Dave
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: splice vs execve lockdep trace., Linus Torvalds |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Your opinion is important to us, Westpac Banking Corporation |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: splice vs execve lockdep trace., Linus Torvalds |
| Next by Thread: | Re: splice vs execve lockdep trace., Al Viro |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |