xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS: Assertion failed: xfs_dir2_sf_lookup(args) == ENOENT, file: fs/

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS: Assertion failed: xfs_dir2_sf_lookup(args) == ENOENT, file: fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_sf.c, line: 358
From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:58:00 -0400
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20130713020030.GG3438@dastard>
Mail-followup-to: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20130712023930.GA6473@xxxxxxxxxx> <20130713020030.GG3438@dastard>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 12:00:30PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
 
 > > [   97.162665] XFS: Assertion failed: xfs_dir2_sf_lookup(args) == ENOENT, 
 > > file: fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_sf.c, line: 358
 > ....
 > 
 > So, it's not clear what has caused this yet. Is it reproducable?

Just hit it again on the same machine.

 > would be good to get a trace of lookup vs addname events from XFS,
 > too (i.e. all the xfs_dir* and xfs_da* events) so we can see if the
 > correct lookups were done prior to the failing addname operation...
 
<- xfs tracing noob. Got a recipe I can cut-n-paste ?
Or a patch if that's necessary..

        Dave

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>