[Top] [All Lists]

Re: inode64 and Firefox

To: stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: inode64 and Firefox
From: aurfalien <aurfalien@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 07:54:43 -0700
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=mVm52qiLTbPilLbXSWk30vpR4apfdCO5Gz2gOc8uMbs=; b=TZKQlcWzyhlnnNIwlYp0kgW46BEMcM+z2JXhZQe17cYCCIUuM5N+ErTUNoBV/QtDk0 3yKIh4emA7AOXFDuP5yILxMmfc3dp/1Vpm1w/N5LRcgbLRnIsuxn0nK2k1MlPDuwFZ/p pVbl1CHFh8h06ZMcnkmthM3a0Udvp3NvWz+k2VXcucvG71C/QFRj+mLUPSlfXPegypTV /UBAuXtOiSLP4xpUSGl8KnN2TUX1cfZbScFTV/5eMB/ixJDUoHEPtl6PLZsEvUdoPeVQ ElzAuuyWNgtegVOP5uPetM5qHThAZe+mbcm+m5dvSoYDThSXPEIDubbMIVNMZf7469BO KJWg==
In-reply-to: <51DC1FB4.7010108@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <EA658AFF-6AEC-41D1-BA40-4103BEF7FD5E@xxxxxxxxx> <51DC1600.7080906@xxxxxxxxxxx> <C7F53623-AA6A-4FD2-90A6-52BBA6562D10@xxxxxxxxx> <51DC198C.70106@xxxxxxxxxxx> <51DC1FB4.7010108@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Jul 9, 2013, at 7:35 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:

> On 7/9/2013 9:09 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> On 7/9/13 9:08 AM, aurfalien wrote:
>>> On Jul 9, 2013, at 6:54 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>>> On 7/9/13 8:37 AM, aurfalien wrote:
>>>>> Before I dig deeper, wondering if any one has issues running Firefox v22 
>>>>> from an XFS file system mounted using inode64 option?
>>>> I've not tried it, but first question - 32-bit or 64-bit firefox?
>>> Its 32 bit FF.  Thunderbird also has issues.  Too bad :(
>> Ok, below was for 64-bit, even!
>> I'd file a bug w/ them, it can't be that hard to fix.  Modern filesystems 
>> have 64 bit inodes, they should handle it!
>> -Eric
>>> Stuck in the stone age.  Got a 24TB fs functioning as a home dir for ~100 
>>> pplz that I would like to modernize.
> Is XFS being mounted via NFS or Samba?


>  Do your server and client
> versions of these support 64 bit inodes?

Yes, everything works except for Mozilla warez.  I'm seeing if there are any 
KDE issues as well.

>  If these are 32 bit Windows
> clients I think it's pretty certain they don't/can't handle 64 bit
> inodes.  Thus this may not be strictly a FF/TB problem.  We need more
> information.

My OS's both actual and virtual are 64 bit.  Lin64 and Win64.

- aurf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>