xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: inode64 and Firefox

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: inode64 and Firefox
From: aurfalien <aurfalien@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 07:08:03 -0700
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=+JyNn5EfuPAyxJ6rm7BZiepBl3YkSTWUXy8Jd3SrYac=; b=l7n5qrXtgWOdHjhoOvFctUKKPqJwf/8WRTXKPkmp5F9vkhJkCEASt6a9m6yw/rRNnR rMI+MP6domnvIq9x49iGul/kMvoTxBJpIJ7GYhF+17S0FOPl1+1rugFnM3GvNR6Oq3D9 uPgdSUH7G+OLlWoJCGzQNrGbII24RRJvZrrWCM70HHFYB9pZ4ijUsPpeNof0M82XnHiq AHmXZmZhMBvNcWqGvqvPb9bwBxNWA9MZDmugMEewY9AjUofWCdFYWyHqEO5U6FCJTvv8 LXHDP8q+1s2Qoi8fZJ2IPeUWa2wVMVp3Ej9fFsT8FxXBTl0o7+El2lca/TbfZFHp8NpU 9Tqw==
In-reply-to: <51DC1600.7080906@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <EA658AFF-6AEC-41D1-BA40-4103BEF7FD5E@xxxxxxxxx> <51DC1600.7080906@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On Jul 9, 2013, at 6:54 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:

> On 7/9/13 8:37 AM, aurfalien wrote:
>> Before I dig deeper, wondering if any one has issues running Firefox v22 
>> from an XFS file system mounted using inode64 option?
> 
> I've not tried it, but first question - 32-bit or 64-bit firefox?

Its 32 bit FF.  Thunderbird also has issues.  Too bad :(

Stuck in the stone age.  Got a 24TB fs functioning as a home dir for ~100 pplz 
that I would like to modernize.

> However, this isn't encouraging:
> 
> $ file /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox
> /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 
> (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.18, stripped
> 
> $ ./summarise_stat.pl /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox
>      1 100.0% use 32-bit stat() family interfaces only
> 
> sooo if my perl script is to be believed, it may be problematic, depending on 
> how serious a stat() failure is.
> 
> -Eric

Thanks for the feedback.

- aurf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>