| To: | aurfalien <aurfalien@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: inode64 and Firefox |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 09 Jul 2013 08:54:08 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <EA658AFF-6AEC-41D1-BA40-4103BEF7FD5E@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <EA658AFF-6AEC-41D1-BA40-4103BEF7FD5E@xxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 |
On 7/9/13 8:37 AM, aurfalien wrote:
> Before I dig deeper, wondering if any one has issues running Firefox v22 from
> an XFS file system mounted using inode64 option?
I've not tried it, but first question - 32-bit or 64-bit firefox?
However, this isn't encouraging:
$ file /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox
/usr/lib64/firefox/firefox: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1
(SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.18, stripped
$ ./summarise_stat.pl /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox
1 100.0% use 32-bit stat() family interfaces only
sooo if my perl script is to be believed, it may be problematic, depending on
how serious a stat() failure is.
-Eric
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | inode64 and Firefox, aurfalien |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: inode64 and Firefox, aurfalien |
| Previous by Thread: | inode64 and Firefox, aurfalien |
| Next by Thread: | Re: inode64 and Firefox, aurfalien |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |