xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx is a list

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx is a list
From: Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 11:36:39 +0200
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, ydroneaud@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20130703092406.GM14996@dastard>
Organization: OPTEYA
References: <1372777248-4114-1-git-send-email-ydroneaud@xxxxxxxxxx> <20130703064026.GL14996@dastard> <c229feab100a72240128ef81297680a1@xxxxxxxx> <20130703092406.GM14996@dastard>
User-agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.9.2
Le 03.07.2013 11:24, Dave Chinner a ÃcritÂ:
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 10:14:41AM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote:
Le 03.07.2013 08:40, Dave Chinner a ÃcritÂ:
>On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 05:00:47PM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote:
>>This patch changes type of xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>The output of ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl is
>>modified to report xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx as a list:
>
>What's the problem with that? All XFS patches and problem
>reports should be sent to the xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx list. There are far
>more people than just the maintainer that can triage problems,
>answer questions and review patches...
>

It was just disturbing: I was looking for a list for XFS
and found only maintainers.

That's what the:

L:      xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx

entry is, yes?


In the output of ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl:

Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> (supporter:XFS FILESYSTEM)
Alex Elder <elder@xxxxxxxxxx> (supporter:XFS FILESYSTEM)
xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx (supporter:XFS FILESYSTEM)
linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list)

[If having the mailing list listed as the maintainer/supporter is correct, could ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl also report the mailing list as a list ?]

Regards.

--
Yann Droneaud
OPTEYA

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>