[Top] [All Lists]

Re: swidth in RAID

To: stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: swidth in RAID
From: aurfalien <aurfalien@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 15:36:06 -0700
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=2jB0Udj8pYr/Kl+XjE5nnhGVITkhp8KxRhsZG9nu0w0=; b=Z8tTUKZFMR67KluvrbXLWo9N8u7BeJKvsgT6a+aVpKOGSNPuk8Z/dMzn5wQ+/fx7n5 LQpU7JUAASoLIdfGYKfLjnLyiX16uHskbHKQ7AsxTr2QHQSMkjbqWQvm6wxiwcNk1JKO xZcquhiC64oYAmMwEc7uOS6MI/kQekK+2C9A7Y6HzDBG309Q3CPnKPsWI/1AVgD80yQJ GYNBPsLCGJSEBHYle1DjiGMi7OvRgZdckPriju3Cb266s+7R8Ob0Cr4y8ac3wJVR5/My HSW/9ZQRJ5ET/wyZJg1Rt7ROWZfvf6sLxh4rDLHThKSBjslHplMLKs1cYGS10+DiPMxh M7qQ==
In-reply-to: <51D0A62E.2020309@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <557F888F-34EA-4669-B861-C0B684DAD13D@xxxxxxxxx> <51D0A62E.2020309@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Jun 30, 2013, at 2:42 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:

> On 6/30/2013 1:43 PM, aurfalien wrote:
>> I understand swidth should = #data disks.
> No.  "swidth" is a byte value specifying the number of 512 byte blocks
> in the data stripe.
> "sw" is #data disks.
>> And the docs say for RAID 6 of 8 disks, that means 6.
>> But parity is distributed and you actually have 8 disks/spindles working for 
>> you and a bit of parity on each.
>> So shouldn't swidth equal disks in raid when its concerning distributed 
>> parity raid?
> No.  Lets try visual aids.
> Set 8 coffee cups (disk drives) on a table.  Grab a bag of m&m's.
> Separate 24 blues (data) and 8 reds (parity).

But are the cups 8oz, 16oz or smaller/larger?

Ceramic, plastic, glass, etc...?

Actually I really enjoyed the visual aid, many many thanks.

- aurf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>