| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | swidth in RAID |
| From: | aurfalien <aurfalien@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 30 Jun 2013 11:43:12 -0700 |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=VK9VZkRBHUcSc4Qp1EIs7caYm3LsJQoOo2ZDMk4/4ko=; b=YNhR7t43nBpP2B2GNruT1KQ7TRZ551iVmprM4aqN+OXBWWnS3v0siWjZvPiEwiauSb KCt5ERmlLirpp4cWSO0OhGM0Q461oqd2KQ0JQLpQ2tRrvADFVkvbopVeL7LQ8bssLMa/ I0cXereoSsc6wx0dT53uW4X/Y4cBLw46Hl7ivurQpDkH7eAuNpWYiyF4ptMl7IOcPCZv YH1+NV9mOX7e2OxJUEkwCue34IQ7aYxbtNMApYeCmzzp8JvEUy3WGZfjGpxmd5IdhU8a 3K9X9HbaiCEIXa5MMKkbAwsCkAXCtc15KGSrUkGYxI37udiKIH5LcUMGjVMigjDWRIOI +YnA== |
Hi, I understand swidth should = #data disks. And the docs say for RAID 6 of 8 disks, that means 6. But parity is distributed and you actually have 8 disks/spindles working for you and a bit of parity on each. So shouldn't swidth equal disks in raid when its concerning distributed parity raid? - aurf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Sayfa Ãnerisi, Facebook |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: swidth in RAID, Peter Grandi |
| Previous by Thread: | Sayfa Ãnerisi, Facebook |
| Next by Thread: | Re: swidth in RAID, Peter Grandi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |