|To:||Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>|
|Subject:||Re: question about xfs soft lockup stuck|
|From:||Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Thu, 27 Jun 2013 09:29:52 -0500|
|Cc:||çææ <yongtaofu@xxxxxxxxx>, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>|
|User-agent:||Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120122 Thunderbird/9.0|
On 06/27/13 09:02, Brian Foster wrote:
On 06/26/2013 11:20 PM, çææ wrote:Dear Brian and xfs experts, Recently we have encountered an issue related to xfs. The log reports xfs soft lockup stuck which is similar to this bug: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=6287 I wan to ask a question. Is this issue already been fixed in kernel 358 or not(BZ#921961, BZ#896224)?Both of those bz's have metadata that shows the fixed-in release. The latter is a backport that notes the fix being pulled back into kernel-2.6.32-358.4.1.el6. BrianThank you very much.
<trace back deleted> Do you have a core?I am looking at something that may be related to this bug in a round about way.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: question about xfs soft lockup stuck, Brian Foster|
|Next by Date:||Re: [PATCH 14/15] xfs: dquot log reservations are too small, Mark Tinguely|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: question about xfs soft lockup stuck, Brian Foster|
|Next by Thread:||[PATCH 00/15] xfs: patchset for 3.11, Dave Chinner|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|