xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 3.10-rc7: general protection fault at xlog_state_do_callback+0x88/0x

To: CAI Qian <caiqian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 3.10-rc7: general protection fault at xlog_state_do_callback+0x88/0x2c0 [xfs]
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 16:55:48 +1000
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <115167995.4467705.1372131291931.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <510496923.4466531.1372130994988.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <115167995.4467705.1372131291931.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:34:51PM -0400, CAI Qian wrote:
> This looks like triggered by xfstests test #13
> 001    17s
> 002    1s
> 003    1s
> 004    2s
> 005    0s
> 006    28s
> 007    51s
> 008    3s
> 009    2s
> 010    [not run] dbtest was not built for this platform
> 011    15s
> 012    3s
> 013   
> 
> [32728.415359] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP  

The system has been running for close on ten hours before xfstests
was run. I'm assuming that it's been running 10 hours of other tests
like for previous bug reports. Can you reproduce this directly after
a clean boot?

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>