On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 09:54:19AM -0400, Dwight Engen wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:41:33 +1000
> Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 01:35:30PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > >
> > > I am copying my gmail address so I have a chance of seeing replies
> > > from Dave Chiner. So far the only way I have been able to read his
> > > replies has been to read mailling lists. Which has not be
> > > conductive to having this code discussed properly. Hopefully
> > > copying my gmail address will allow us to have a reasonable and
> > > timely conversation.
> > >
> > >
> > > Dwight Engen <dwight.engen@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > >
> > > > Use uint32 from init_user_ns for xfs internal uid/gid
> > > > representation in acl, xfs_icdinode.
> > >
> > > From my review of the code earlier that just isn't safe. It allows
> > > all kinds of things to slip through.
> >
> > Such as?
>
> Maybe saying "at the vfs boundary" is misleading, I guess I don't see
> how this is all that different from what you did in the other
> filesystems. Using ext4 as the example the conversions are done between:
> struct inode <-> struct ext4_inode
> struct posix_acl <-> ext4_acle_entry
>
> which in xfs is analogous to
> struct inode <-> struct xfs_icdinode
> struct posix acl <-> struct xfs_acl_entry
>
> which is where I did the conversions.
Yup, that's where they should occur for XFS.
> > The kuid_t/kgid_t is actually pushed down this far - it's in the
> > struct inode - the code currently uses the on-disk XFS uid/gid,
> > not the struct inode's kuid_t/kgid_t. That's easily fixable.
>
> Yep, I'll go through the code and switch to the inode where possible.
Cool. We'll need to be careful, though - there are some code paths
that XFS inodes can pass through where the VFS(ip) hasn't been
initialised. Let me worry about this during review, though ;)
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
|