[Top] [All Lists]

Re: definitions for /proc/fs/xfs/stat

To: Stefan Ring <stefanrin@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: definitions for /proc/fs/xfs/stat
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:15:40 +1000
Cc: Mark Seger <mjseger@xxxxxxxxx>, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linux fs XFS <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAAxjCEwhwqFhPbJsJGYUCqwF5qc7iZpNJpELOkR-9NNuPzFxBw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <CAC2B=ZGgr5WPWOEehHDHKekM8yHgQ3QS4HMzM8+j217AfEoPyQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130616001130.GE29338@dastard> <CAC2B=ZFZskLnp5baVJK+R1xrpOfTkr1QXpA9jyHvxfk5Wd4yDg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <419435719.1662203.1371431489790.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <20130617024603.GJ29338@dastard> <1597962722.1767244.1371447710942.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <CAC2B=ZENLd7hoP=U08hyb6xFw6ye0nL5MMW+iDnTXTcoKCYEvA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130617111347.GL29338@dastard> <CAC2B=ZGm4W=oFY+8sWAefhH79qK5N7yma4qQh_AQaOGiQDUWhw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAAxjCEwhwqFhPbJsJGYUCqwF5qc7iZpNJpELOkR-9NNuPzFxBw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:28:19PM +0200, Stefan Ring wrote:
> > I asked around and people believe the cache is on the order of a few GB and
> > the test ran I was intentionally large enough to overshadow any cache
> > effects, running for about a minute and doing 100K 1K file creates.  The
> > disk write data was close to a sustained 475MB/sec and would have easily
> > filled the cache in the first handful of seconds which would have produced
> > enough backpressure to slow down the write rate which it never did.
> If a limited number of blocks gets written over and over, you won't
> ever fill the cache.

Right, and the XFS log is circular and about 1GB in size on the
filesystem under test, so should fit completely in cache. Hence
speeds faster than a physical disk are acheivable if the log stays
resident in the cache....


Dave Chinner

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>