xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: definitions for /proc/fs/xfs/stat

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: definitions for /proc/fs/xfs/stat
From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 08:18:49 -0500
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20130617111940.GM29338@dastard>
References: <CAC2B=ZFP_Fg34aFpk857stgB7MGcrYs9tybRS-ttw1CXNeU41Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130615020414.GB29338@dastard> <CAC2B=ZEUkd+ADnQLUKj9S-3rdo2=93WbW0tbLbwwHUvkh6v7Rw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAC2B=ZGgr5WPWOEehHDHKekM8yHgQ3QS4HMzM8+j217AfEoPyQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130616001130.GE29338@dastard> <CAC2B=ZFZskLnp5baVJK+R1xrpOfTkr1QXpA9jyHvxfk5Wd4yDg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <419435719.1662203.1371431489790.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <20130617024603.GJ29338@dastard> <1597962722.1767244.1371447710942.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <20130617111940.GM29338@dastard>
Reply-to: stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
On 6/17/2013 6:19 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:

> I mean, Linus said Direct IO is for deranged monkeys, so nobody
> should ever use direct IO, right? ;)

As it turns out, there are simply far more deranged monkeys running
loose than Linus anticipated. :)

-- 
Stan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>