|To:||Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>|
|Subject:||Re: definitions for /proc/fs/xfs/stat|
|From:||Mark Seger <mjseger@xxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Mon, 17 Jun 2013 06:57:14 -0400|
|Cc:||Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx|
|Dkim-signature:||v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=KriazZIvCdnXbkF1V3tej4SXPFXNJrWUChe7BzeYOC8=; b=KQSrKXer1KWLkhjB2N5qQ4CZXlMOKajPuPpVv3ac83x+UYHdj2b8SoN8vAnH/sTWDn qBzLJtbO6YEN5iTmEAgUf11/OaAXQsmzgTBO3q5H53J/uII9wdLUPpFeTp3P2I7WcsSf Bze+9FHhnkyHEc6ohZ9Ynnk3bxCFMRT4Pjp8IobPQgKG+QRQjxPbKW3ph1ZC5rNbrzXg 3CqV7oCaceQY2F5WuYpuHkxFntdWW13jnd0IRe96RVzTaQmgG30/S1OnBB5UvbAkJzr7 Yalr+3rhdFyLaPqVU5Nr4T+Kb1fXhjoVXe4z8SDnVOPbZQEJPEFOisgOgQrR+kIis34D IQZQ==|
|References:||<CAC2B=ZFP_Fg34aFpk857stgB7MGcrYs9tybRS-ttw1CXNeU41Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130615020414.GB29338@dastard> <CAC2B=ZEUkd+ADnQLUKj9S-3rdo2=93WbW0tbLbwwHUvkh6v7Rw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAC2B=ZGgr5WPWOEehHDHKekM8yHgQ3QS4HMzM8+j217AfEoPyQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130616001130.GE29338@dastard> <CAC2B=ZFZskLnp5baVJK+R1xrpOfTkr1QXpA9jyHvxfk5Wd4yDg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <419435719.1662203.1371431489790.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <20130617024603.GJ29338@dastard> <1597962722.1767244.1371447710942.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx>|
all - good conversation and again, thanks for digging into this. The comment about me running on an older kernel seems to be the problem and by rerunning my test on precise/3.5.0-23-generic all seems to be operating correctly, so I guess that was it.
However, the one thing that does jump out of this is that proc/fs/xsfstats and pcp were both showing many hundred MB/sec during tests that only ran for a few seconds, which is impossible so it still feels some like sort of accounting bug to me. On the other hand if the fact that this was an older kernel, and newer kernels are fine, perhaps it's something just to note and not worry about.
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:41 AM, Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|