| To: | Mark Seger <mjseger@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: definitions for /proc/fs/xfs/stat |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 15 Jun 2013 12:04:14 +1000 |
| Cc: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <CAC2B=ZF+eMyNLPQmhA_onDPEUqgNfcgCdZVvobNH9pofvioN7Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <CAC2B=ZFP_Fg34aFpk857stgB7MGcrYs9tybRS-ttw1CXNeU41Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <91017249.1356192.1371248207334.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <CAC2B=ZHYV6d-1PO_=-jXsQidZnYPHVwcVAaQh2mxJt=5K03AEA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <504625587.1365681.1371255450937.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <CAC2B=ZF+eMyNLPQmhA_onDPEUqgNfcgCdZVvobNH9pofvioN7Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 09:55:17PM -0400, Mark Seger wrote: > I'm doing 1 second samples and the rates are very steady. The reason I > ended up at this level of testing was I had done a sustained test for 2 > minutes at about 5MB/sec and was seeing over 500MB/sec going to the disk, > again sampling at 1-second intervals. I'd be happy to provide detailed > output and can even sample more frequently if you like. Where are you getting your IO throughput numbers from? How do they compare to, say, the output of `iostat -d -x -m 1`? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: definitions for /proc/fs/xfs/stat, Mark Seger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS (vdb): Corruption detected. Unmount and run xfs_repair, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: definitions for /proc/fs/xfs/stat, Mark Seger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: definitions for /proc/fs/xfs/stat, Mark Seger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |