xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

attack upon XFS, misinformation abounds, linux-raid list

To: "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: attack upon XFS, misinformation abounds, linux-raid list
From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2013 05:46:21 -0500
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-to: stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
In a recent linux-raid list thread here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-raid&m=137072140106867&w=2

seriously flawed arguments against the reliability of XFS, and even the
performance of XFS, are made.  The OP even quotes Dave's LCA
presentation as a performance reason to avoid XFS.  The party really
gets started at paragraph 7.

I made a brief effort to debunk his claims and explained that he can't
have O_PONIES, that he should use fsync or O_DIRECT, etc for data
safety.  To non experts/advanced filesystem users, his long winded
argument may be persuasive.  Obviously none of you experts has time to
debunk every such post, but this one may be worth a read at least,
especially given the weight Google gives to vger lists.

-- 
Stan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>