[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfstests: fix seek_sanity_test for fs w/o fallocate

To: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: fix seek_sanity_test for fs w/o fallocate
From: "gnehzuil.liu" <gnehzuil.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 23:51:11 +0800
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, ext4 development <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date :to; bh=ZGN9tjKN46qxMIeJTUwqT+WRuOEheH0i79Tu5QO+xqs=; b=Ivfa4vtOCpeIzhdhzq01OexPbFjIZEuO+XQfOa/DV3j8DQPbrHJNXkDCrPROg296fX VYewWk4bftrm/eHN/EN3AwApUQW/ByB0R9C8aqd7u2w1eUf6D9rqrXb9zSvzZeDOk2rO FcmA4vb+AJ2aDWXhlTc8tz2lGwwXxqQfFvZWCZ/MrH5vOaKpEmDnL1LFvsbPO3GCIt/U KxeeAv+acpYFV3ILGlegdWt/Cbeig16cTGViKwt9ButC3fFP/xzOIZg5Uy63RoxYJDJk T4v2oMXvNt9RlvVy5K/5qvoFC052PbRiQNJIxyRCf1HiZcjnTcXmLhWdaUe53CfskJi2 g/tg==
In-reply-to: <51A8F3CE.4030801@xxxxxxx>
References: <51A8C59B.3030308@xxxxxxxxxx> <20130531172456.GB6915@xxxxxxxxx> <51A8DACB.2030806@xxxxxxxxxx> <51A8F3CE.4030801@xxxxxxx>
在 2013-6-1,上午3:02,Rich Johnston <rjohnston@xxxxxxx> 写道:

> On 05/31/2013 12:15 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> On 5/31/13 12:24 PM, Zheng Liu wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:45:31AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>>> currently the seek_sanity_test (generic/285) fails on ext3
>>>> or ext2 due to fallocate() failures.  Just ignore that test
>>>> if the fs doesn't support fallocate.
>>> Hi Eric,
>>> I remember that my patch had been applied [1].  But stranger I couldn't
>>> find it in xfstests tree.  However, I think that your patch is better.
>>> 1. http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-05/msg00534.html
>> Oh, right, I had forgotten about that.  Rich, any idea?
> No other than it was a Friday.  My apologies Zheng.
> Zheng as your's should have been committed, what do you want me to do?

Hi Rich,

Sorry for my late reply.  As Eric said, please apply his patch because it is 

                                                - Zheng
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>