xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 3.9.4 Oops running xfstests (WAS Re: 3.9.3: Oops running xfstests)

To: CAI Qian <caiqian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 3.9.4 Oops running xfstests (WAS Re: 3.9.3: Oops running xfstests)
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 00:35:08 -0500
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mm <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1462663454.9294499.1369969415681.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <510292845.4997401.1369279175460.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <1985929268.4997720.1369279277543.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <20130523035115.GY24543@dastard> <986348673.5787542.1369385526612.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <20130527053608.GS29466@dastard> <1588848128.8530921.1369885528565.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <20130530052049.GK29466@dastard> <1824023060.8558101.1369892432333.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <1462663454.9294499.1369969415681.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
On 5/30/13 10:03 PM, CAI Qian wrote:
> OK, so the minimal workload to trigger this I found so far was to
> run trinity, ltp and then xfstests. I have been able to easily
> reproduced on 3 servers so far, and I'll post full logs here for
> LKML and linux-mm as this may unrelated to XFS only. As far as
> I can tell from the previous testing results, this has never been
> reproduced back in 3.9 GA time. This seems also been reproduced
> on 3.10-rc3 mostly on s390x so far.
> CAI Qian
> 

Can you hit it w/o trinity?   I ask because trinity's stated
goal is to fuzz and corrupt, right - so it's quite possible
that blowing up later in xfs is a side effect?

-Eric

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>