On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 03:50:59PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 06:02:05PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > xfs_attr3_leaf_unbalance() uses a temporary buffer for recombining
> > the entries in two leaves when the destination leaf requires
> > compaction. The temporary buffer ends up being copied back over the
> > original destination buffer, so the header in the temporary buffer
> > needs to contain all the information that is in the destination
> > buffer.
> >
> > To make sure the temporary buffer is fully initialised, once we've
> > set up the temporary incore header appropriately, write is back to
> > the temporary buffer before starting to move entries around.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > ---
> > fs/xfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
> > index 0bce1b3..79ece72 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_attr_leaf.c
> > @@ -2181,14 +2181,24 @@ xfs_attr3_leaf_unbalance(
> > struct xfs_attr_leafblock *tmp_leaf;
> > struct xfs_attr3_icleaf_hdr tmphdr;
> >
> > - tmp_leaf = kmem_alloc(state->blocksize, KM_SLEEP);
> > - memset(tmp_leaf, 0, state->blocksize);
> > - memset(&tmphdr, 0, sizeof(tmphdr));
> > + tmp_leaf = kmem_zalloc(state->blocksize, KM_SLEEP);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Copy the header into the temp leaf so that all the stuff
> > + * not in the incore header is present and gets copied back in
> > + * once we've moved all the entries.
> > + */
> > + memcpy(tmp_leaf, save_leaf, xfs_attr3_leaf_hdr_size(save_leaf));
> >
> > + memset(&tmphdr, 0, sizeof(tmphdr));
> > tmphdr.magic = savehdr.magic;
> > tmphdr.forw = savehdr.forw;
> > tmphdr.back = savehdr.back;
> > tmphdr.firstused = state->blocksize;
> > +
> > + /* write the header to the temp buffer to initialise it */
> > + xfs_attr3_leaf_hdr_to_disk(tmp_leaf, &tmphdr);
> > +
>
> Hrm. It seemed like the memset 0 for the incore temp header should have been
> enough for the purposes of moveents. Why did you have to add this additional
> hdr_to_disk?
Because we've modified the tmphdr so it is different to what is in
the tmp_leaf, and I'm being paranoid and not making any assumptions
that a callee doesn't reread the tmphdr from the tmp_leaf.
i.e. I'm initialising both the on-disk and the incore headers to
be identical before we do anything else. Once bitten, twice shy.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
|