[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfstests comma separated group names

To: Itaru Kitayama <itaru.kitayama@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests comma separated group names
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 10:45:53 +1000
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CANW9uytQDPaBr_VAGMuwSqhStCfyMCGmV_A3ccNzOExi-KeZfQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <CANW9uytRpGXcd9x=HWMEoFvd3_9G98CN_Tv3YacTtd1h+Gq=4g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130520113045.GB24543@dastard> <CANW9uytQDPaBr_VAGMuwSqhStCfyMCGmV_A3ccNzOExi-KeZfQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 08:42:35PM +0900, Itaru Kitayama wrote:
> Yes, we can do that, but I just thought as you originally proposed last year
> -g rw,attr reads better.

Agreed, it does read better and is easily to type.

That's what you need to put in the commit message - why it is better
than what we currently have, and whether it is badwards compatible
or not (doesn't break any existing scripts). i.e. the commit
message is for telling people -why- the change should be made as we
can look at the code to determine -what- the change is.  ;)


Dave Chinner

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>