| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 00/30] xfsprogs: Initial CRC support |
| From: | "Michael L. Semon" <mlsemon35@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 18 May 2013 14:13:21 -0400 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vzxLwQmAacFbMuuRWnmgD2rS3WutRCMBKGgjP7MKLms=; b=IF9QckV/cNRbox7QeREZnvrQRl5R6KD8oPJ9CAwyRzpXlFS8za/bTPo0Xb9dG4pdXD 6+Swmh1G6D+M8cNCWtRq7AWQ2YA3/cOesmqyt7iipMQvOME+yfkgnx02LOxMWdtDhzGK QxMbMwygPhdLOuuU8RXiGE6lwq7yga69GxLw5w533Qk7zAbyouNRpWGhLreCubkRXCNH UEMD9e9DOYJ3u60t3qliNIKZAGZAvxXI53joQe3vcyfhEfS38I9BiZgAUBPxFVn9kvei 4s7CEZwGzy1k6OV4A/VvTHdC9GU89pmn/i1JWh6g45D7iHwfkrrgH7EDvAsoO2eQD5JO QGvQ== |
| In-reply-to: | <1368789205-19969-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1368789205-19969-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 |
On 05/17/2013 07:12 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: Hi Folks, This is the first real "works ok" CRC patchset for xfsprogs. It provides full support for mkfs.xfs and xfs_repair, and partial read-only support for xfs_db. For mkfs.xfs, it does everything properly, and filesystems that are freshly made also run cleanly through xfs_repair and mount and run just fine. This seemed to be worthy of early note:xfs/031 30s ...[ 587.843478] XFS (sdb6): Version 5 superblock detected. This kernel has EXPERIMENTAL support enabled! [ 587.843478] Use of these features in this kernel is at your own risk!*** Error in `/sbin/mkfs.xfs': malloc(): smallbin double linked list corrupted: 0x0907f7d0 *** The test doesn't seem to finish, but Ctrl-c ends the test cleanly. No dmesg stuff is added, and strace doesn't show anything between the mount message and the error message. I'll need to re-enable tracers to provide a trace...and as traces can be huge, I'll wait on your advice. [BTW, the "30s" reference time is from the non-CRC run of your patched xfsprogs. The non-CRC run looked good.] Thanks! Michael |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: test data integrity under disk failure, Dmitry Monakhov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | XFS hangup - Failed to recover EFIs, Punk Rider |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 00/30] xfsprogs: Initial CRC support, Michael L. Semon |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 0/6] xfsprogs: more CRC support patches, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |