Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 311: fsck the dmflakey device instead of the real device V2

[Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 08:04:20AM -0600, Rich Johnston wrote:
> On 05/15/2013 10:20 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > Dave pointed out that xfs was having issues with 311 because of caching 
> > issues.
> > He suggested that I fsck the dm-flakey device to make sure we don't have 
> > this
> > problem.  Make _check_scratch_fs take an optional argument to use as the 
> > device
> > to fsck.  Thanks,
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> Hi Josef,
> 
> Looks like it fails test 19 , are we supposed to see failures for ext4 
> and xfs?
> 

Yeah that's what I was seeing, if you run the fsync tester without the reboot
option and look at the file itself it should match the md5sum thats in the good
output.  Thanks,

Josef