xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 311: fsck the dmflakey device instead of the real

To: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 311: fsck the dmflakey device instead of the real device V2
From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 16:30:35 -0400
Cc: Josef Bacik <JBacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fusionio.com; s=default; t=1368736237; bh=WaJf6+64qS+RRH+wcHcTpvHRAKY8xmgu9b0fyXCx+lc=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=NmuStNIcEJoYMAqQLQ7ZD15rSMH3+fLp1XvIYKcq6hxYAdZ68wIg7efIovKmINUlM 8rr4GlSdOWoCb3HuwDr0mCrc+Ssd7V0OL2LpZFLnCMIn3Yh4YGElWyAOSFF0sCf9at 71d9I7vClNQydAElylSq/aUK2lM+t+1AhPFGVixc=
In-reply-to: <5194E764.6030207@xxxxxxx>
References: <1368631217-15511-1-git-send-email-jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <5194E764.6030207@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2011-07-01)
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 08:04:20AM -0600, Rich Johnston wrote:
> On 05/15/2013 10:20 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > Dave pointed out that xfs was having issues with 311 because of caching 
> > issues.
> > He suggested that I fsck the dm-flakey device to make sure we don't have 
> > this
> > problem.  Make _check_scratch_fs take an optional argument to use as the 
> > device
> > to fsck.  Thanks,
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> Hi Josef,
> 
> Looks like it fails test 19 , are we supposed to see failures for ext4 
> and xfs?
> 

Yeah that's what I was seeing, if you run the fsync tester without the reboot
option and look at the file itself it should match the md5sum thats in the good
output.  Thanks,

Josef

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>