| To: | Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH v5] xfstests: add a new test case for ext4 indirect-based file |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 15 May 2013 10:22:11 -0500 |
| Cc: | Rich Johnston <rjohnston@xxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20130515153146.GA17148@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1368463235-14478-1-git-send-email-wenqing.lz@xxxxxxxxxx> <519394D8.2050005@xxxxxxx> <20130515153146.GA17148@xxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 |
On 5/15/13 10:31 AM, Zheng Liu wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 08:59:52AM -0500, Rich Johnston wrote: > [...] >> Hey Zheng, >> >> Thanks for submitting this patch. Looks like this patch does not >> apply cleanly. > > Hi Rich, > > Yes, this patch bases against Eric's patch: > [PATCH] xfstests: automatically add -F to xfs_io on non-xfs > > But his patch hasn't been applied. So that is why this patch doesn't > apply cleanly. Do I need to resend a cleanly version? My patch is now applied... The joys of distributed development ;) -Eric > Thanks, > - Zheng > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] xfstests: 311: fsck the dmflakey device instead of the real device V2, Josef Bacik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH v5] xfstests: add a new test case for ext4 indirect-based file, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH v5] xfstests: add a new test case for ext4 indirect-based file, Zheng Liu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH v5] xfstests: add a new test case for ext4 indirect-based file, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |