[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH v4] xfstests: add a new test case for ext4 indirect-based fil

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] xfstests: add a new test case for ext4 indirect-based file
From: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 17:32:45 +0800
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@xxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Rich Johnston <rjohnston@xxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=dQjINE9WnTn8/USVBkotDFtizrK7RpspwvNSSqoiuQE=; b=wEljVvrvqbjpGiljJ933wB2pxMG54Ix1gO+asArU1R5XEO7HSywSxsebKUDMQXJFN5 GCEg0zaoWGJ+jlDEr9njJI6rFqlkMbkW3Lm1blTDm0/RCc0do0EomODvy5DVsj+SiR2F e63+77frrZto1TFJp02EL42U+iuC+p40F2z9YwJlcBvmvxudjChsX3htOFNTlVJipmVd qhTyQyJ6v3WEtChW9CpNCFGogcnV0OVCTecHMjdQNWDNRS9kCUsv4RNe/0ICTnprPstS OfbLbdg3QcOltBuPQHISJQSLYEOQ1NxWnEzqo/aVuqP21KlMVz6sI2idOK4ENq+8nJ1N VpGA==
In-reply-to: <20130513004439.GJ32675@dastard>
References: <1368358464-11173-1-git-send-email-wenqing.lz@xxxxxxxxxx> <20130513004439.GJ32675@dastard>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:44:39AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 07:34:24PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> > From: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > After applied this commit (864688d3), xfstests #255 will not test a
> > file system that cannot support fallocate(2), such as a indirect-based
> > file in ext4.  So we need to add a new generic test case to test it.
> > 
> > The difference between #255 and this test case is only to use pwrite to
> > allocate blocks.  Other filesystems should survive in this test case.
> > In the mean time, a new argument '-u' is added into _test_generic_punch
> > not to run unwritten tests.
> > 
> > Meanwhile this commit fixes a minor problem in #255 that testfile should
> > use $seq.$$ as testfile.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@xxxxxxx>
> This will need to be rebased on top of Eric's patch that removes the
> need to pass -F to xfs_io for non-xfs filesystems....

Hi Dave,

Thanks for review.  I guess that you metioned this patch, right?
  [PATCH] xfstests: automatically add -F to xfs_io on non-xfs

But I couldn't find it in xfstests tree.  Has it been applied into the
tree?  Or maybe I use a wrong tree to generate my patch.  I clone the
tree from here:

Is that right?  Or maybe I need to apply Eric's patch manually and
rebase my patch?

> > --- a/tests/generic/group
> > +++ b/tests/generic/group
> > @@ -114,3 +114,4 @@
> >  309 auto quick
> >  310 auto
> >  311 auto metadata log
> > +314 auto quick prealloc
> Why would you add it to the prealloc group? The whole point of the
> test is that it doesn't use prealloc, right?

Good catch!  Fix it soon.

                                                - Zheng

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>