xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfstests: regression test for ext4 resize with non-extent fi

To: guaneryu@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: regression test for ext4 resize with non-extent files
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 22:05:56 -0500
Cc: xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, ext4 development <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CA+dCu8_DtrqMy97u9NfHwCC8_-z9uSrF1oR3B=ej15gL6C=W+Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <518C1D08.4080309@xxxxxxxxxx> <CA+dCu8_DtrqMy97u9NfHwCC8_-z9uSrF1oR3B=ej15gL6C=W+Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
On 5/9/13 10:03 PM, Eryu Guan wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> 

...

>     index 53af708..4c3e2f4 100644
>     --- a/tests/ext4/group
>     +++ b/tests/ext4/group
>     @@ -9,3 +9,4 @@
>      303 aio dangerous ioctl rw stress
>      304 aio dangerous ioctl rw stress
>      305 auto
>     +306 dangerous rw resize quick
> 
> 
> I'm wondering why it's not in auto group :)


because I forgot about auto! :)

But it's also somewhat dangerous; it could oops or hang, so perhaps
auto is not a good idea.

-Eric


> Otherwise patch looks good to me.
> 
> Eryu Guan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>