xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 3.9.0: general protection fault

To: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 3.9.0: general protection fault
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 22:28:44 +1000
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <km7oop$28c$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <kltu6o$33j$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <km7oop$28c$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 10:14:22AM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> And anpther protection fault, this time with 3.9.0. Always happens
> on one of the servers. Its ECC memory, so I don't suspect a faulty
> memory bank. Going to fsck now-

http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ#Q:_What_information_should_I_include_when_reporting_a_problem.3F

> 
> >[303340.514052] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> >[303340.517913] Modules linked in: fhgfs(O) fhgfs_client_opentk(O)

Kernel tainted with out of tree modules. Can you reproduce the
problem with them?

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>