xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] xfs: Allow pquota and gquota to be used together

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] xfs: Allow pquota and gquota to be used together
From: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 12:28:03 -0500
Cc: XFS mailing list <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20130322020243.GR17758@dastard>
Organization: IBM
References: <1363902774-19292-1-git-send-email-sekharan@xxxxxxxxxx> <20130322020243.GR17758@dastard>
Reply-to: sekharan@xxxxxxxxxx
Hi Dave,

Now that CRC changes are in. I am beginning to get my patches on top ot
the current tree.

If you can review and provide me feedback on my patch set, I will work
it in my next revision.

Regards,

Chandra
On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 13:02 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 04:52:49PM -0500, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> > Hello All,
> > 
> > This is the version 7 of the changes to allow pquota and gquota to be used
> > together.
> > 
> > Patchset applies cleanly on top of 56cea2d088811b8cf7d2893e29bcf369a912de69
> > in xfs git tree.
> > 
> > Ran latest xfstests against it.
> 
> As an information point - I've got a separate pquota inode in the
> version 5 superblock format used in the CRC patchset. Given that
> this functionailty requires mkfs/db/repair support, woul dit be
> better to wait until the CRC code goes in and we can then add this
> feature without having to rework the superblock CRC patches around
> it?
> 
> i.e. it will always be available on v5 superblocks, or v4
> superblocks when the feature bit is set to indicate the pquota inode
> part of the superblock is valid?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] xfs: Allow pquota and gquota to be used together, Chandra Seetharaman <=