| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: noop or deadline on an SSD? |
| From: | Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 21 Apr 2013 19:58:00 -0500 |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <CAEDdjHcoZc2eS=hgb7K7BVf=2z28uh3CMuEU8+qFPp5UFvj-iQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <CAEDdjHcoZc2eS=hgb7K7BVf=2z28uh3CMuEU8+qFPp5UFvj-iQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 |
On 4/21/2013 5:38 PM, Pedro Ribeiro wrote: > Ok, I also read that with an SSD I should be using noop or deadline. And > which one of these would perform better with XFS with an SSD? And while I'm > at it, which one would be best for a mechanical drive? $ echo [noop|deadline] > /sys/block/sdX/queue/scheduler Given the ease with which one can switch between the two, it's far better to test each yourself with your hardware and workloads, than to rely on any generic advice. -- Stan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [no subject], Александр |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfsprogs: xfs_quota allow user or group names beginning with digits, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | noop or deadline on an SSD?, Pedro Ribeiro |
| Next by Thread: | [no subject], Александр |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |