|To:||Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Subject:||Re: xfstests: kludge patch for per-dir test number sorting by ./check|
|From:||"Michael L. Semon" <mlsemon35@xxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Sun, 14 Apr 2013 23:29:14 -0400|
|Dkim-signature:||v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9owTgYX3jTcIicHFH1+X20HivtIqwJHuLw5N8dA6n3I=; b=ZqHJFkw3Biz84vqOspg3OzLWRxbl2DCwBut6Xtmv1znxQCDZ1JDLYJiZlv/4nZR1SR YJmxrLV/5CSluVCJ390d3lRptMoZHb2JWe3Zx3WLao3mkB3WGpWbqZKWrEv6OVZuvR+z +uSJ1HO+7xKtjF+tyVB/r3aWb5kovEw470A/1Df3fMT7YjoN5r9hSaeA5rtjeM8TntfZ sIUlg7vuUA76kqvAE2lKj0Mkj9+GhROY29a37sasw+h+clZAUI0OYSEd6PMY14k7iTan 47VE8URdu58eg2hgwW2CoNEXNM75+ympgScbYQK4oUcGuG/gyjZ4ZQQBwB6y2KCdYrJf VcBQ==|
|User-agent:||Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5|
On 04/14/2013 07:26 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 04:50:06PM -0400, Michael L. Semon wrote:I'm trying to get the new xfstests to run the XFS tests first, thenThe question is why do you want to do this? Is there any specific reason for running the tests in that order? FWIW, if all you want to do is run the xfs tests, run: $ sudo ./check xfs[0-9][0-9][0-9] Cheers, Dave.
Personal preference. I'd like to run both series of tests, sometimes attended, sometimes unattended. It's fine if a generic/ test crashes the PC while running unattended, but I'd much rather the xfs/ tests have first crack at that.
My version of the syntax was `./check xfs/[0-9][0-9][0-9]`, but that becomes rough when skipping tests. I'll still try your version, but irrationality and frustration have driven me to simply adding a "mls" group to all of the tests/<fsgroup>/group files, then hoping that a `./check -g mls` would run everything in the correct order. That led to trying to figure out why the generic/ tests were running first, and so on and so forth...
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: need help how to debug xfs crash issue xfs_iunlink_remove: xfs_inotobp() returned error 22, 符永涛|
|Next by Date:||[PATCH] capture the failure result of 310, Zhao Hongjiang|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: xfstests: kludge patch for per-dir test number sorting by ./check, Dave Chinner|
|Next by Thread:||Re: xfstests: kludge patch for per-dir test number sorting by ./check, Rich Johnston|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|