| To: | Rich Johnston <rjohnston@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: New xfstests generic/308 causes XFS hang (high CPU use), at least on 32-bit |
| From: | "Michael L. Semon" <mlsemon35@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:31:17 -0400 |
| Cc: | "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=sJgu0HA0OUxQY0QD0yBQcMNM1cmWBpWfzSjxuf9UzrY=; b=Z+VbV7TLqcAKO6zj1vsqyvsq6whdbmPE5PtdzWeEeKBlG6knjK8taBcyGIv+zivhZ9 09BWZD4gbqDGFWDyArn85iWK9tKC+ga1BjgfGl/LWbhNJlSQlPkxw5oYzPzKQPWb5/k9 p+C35oY8c+wrw2hwiWEUoxfpJdF5hJgjavPMDw2rpekthlDzp46pkDYUGzslRaaXJdqv O1c7+70syM6lIi3YyNF08WiRWkO5xy1QxnFYsNI2tbwE8UWP73gB+Jv1zTWTv486+VXU jYPQF9la8jZ3VfjtLYO8q+Y+TZqeYxBCJXMbNeNfhfNw38eDdygHtpddgSuSDaEVb05q LOxg== |
| In-reply-to: | <516574AD.7060706@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <51656D47.9010806@xxxxxxxxx> <516571CA.1020908@xxxxxxxxx> <516574AD.7060706@xxxxxxx> |
|
On casual glance, it looks like a test meant to test the end of 32-bit offsets, built to test a specific ext4 case, and it happened to strafe XFS on 32-bit in the process. It is unknown to me whether a script with 64-bit version of the numbers would have a bad effect. Michael On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Rich Johnston <rjohnston@xxxxxxx> wrote: On 04/10/2013 09:06 AM, Michael L. Semon wrote: |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: New xfstests generic/308 causes XFS hang (high CPU use), at least on 32-bit, Rich Johnston |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 13/22] xfs: add CRC checking to dir2 leaf blocks, Ben Myers |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: New xfstests generic/308 causes XFS hang (high CPU use), at least on 32-bit, Rich Johnston |
| Next by Thread: | Re: New xfstests generic/308 causes XFS hang (high CPU use), at least on 32-bit, Jeff Liu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |