| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Loopback device hung [was Re: xfs deadlock on 3.9-rc5 running xfstests case #78] |
| From: | Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 9 Apr 2013 09:01:39 +0200 |
| Cc: | Phillip Susi <psusi@xxxxxxxxxx>, CAI Qian <caiqian@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20130409065519.GH17758@dastard> |
| References: | <20130402071937.GC3670@xxxxxxxxx> <20130402073035.GD3670@xxxxxxxxx> <14055702.547701.1364891947331.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <20130402090047.GF3670@xxxxxxxxx> <985125161.581860.1364895066584.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxx> <20130402094834.GA4667@xxxxxxxxx> <20130403114142.GP4667@xxxxxxxxx> <515C4D9D.10103@xxxxxxxxxx> <515DE2FE.1080201@xxxxxxxxxx> <20130409065519.GH17758@dastard> |
On Tue, Apr 09 2013, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 04:30:54PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote: > > > I have not tested it yet, but I am pretty sure it won't work. It > > > looks like the patch changes the BLKRRPART path to go ahead and remove > > > existing partitions when GENHD_FL_NO_PARTSCAN is set. loop doesn't > > > issue the BLKRRPART ioctl when !LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN so this won't help. > > > I think loop needs to set GENHD_FL_NO_PARTSCAN and then issue the > > > ioctl regardless of the LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN flag to get the partitions > > > to be removed. I will try to test tonight. > > > > After testing, my initial thoughts appeared to have been correct. I had > > to modify the patch as follows. To test, simply do: > > > > truncate -s 10m img > > losetup /dev/loop0 img > > parted /dev/loop0 > > mklabel msdos > > mkpart primary ext2 1m 2m > > quit > > ls /dev/loop0* > > > > Note the /dev/loop0p1 node. Run losetup -d /dev/loop0 and see if it is > > still there. > > Jens, can we get one of these fixes merged quickly? xfstests is > unusable on any kernel more recent than 3.9-rc4 because of these > problems.... Yep, did the revert yesterday and it's going out today. -- Jens Axboe |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Loopback device hung [was Re: xfs deadlock on 3.9-rc5 running xfstests case #78], Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Loopback device hung [was Re: xfs deadlock on 3.9-rc5 running xfstests case #78], Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Loopback device hung [was Re: xfs deadlock on 3.9-rc5 running xfstests case #78], Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Loopback device hung [was Re: xfs deadlock on 3.9-rc5 running xfstests case #78], Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |