xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Xfs_repair and journalling -- EXT4 journal replay discussion

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Xfs_repair and journalling -- EXT4 journal replay discussion
From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 06:24:09 -0500
Cc: Subranshu Patel <spatel.ml@xxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <5157493A.1040406@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <CAEUQceh-Xcabr0KErxF6EAdafDDP1PY_AeHwgYB82QeUdyGp-g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5147E360.10605@xxxxxxxxxxx> <5148037B.5010706@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (sfid-20130319_091205_759083_BA6F1AD2) <201303190924.29362.Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <51483A7D.9050202@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5156DF72.1090703@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5157237A.40006@xxxxxxxxxxx> <51573461.8070006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5157493A.1040406@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4
On 3/30/2013 3:21 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:

> I didn't need it verbatim, just wondered.  I agree, private emails
> probably should stay that way, w/o permission otherwise.

The link is dead.  I did this simply to show I wasn't pulling things
outta thin air and that my info was now correct, and because Ted
provided a lot of insight I didn't parrot in my post.  As long as nobody
copy/pasted that content anywhere it should only be 'public' in the gray
matter of a few folks on this list, as it shouldn't have been archived
by any bots, even though the dead link has been.

-- 
Stan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>