[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Xfs_repair and journalling -- EXT4 journal replay discussion

To: stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Xfs_repair and journalling -- EXT4 journal replay discussion
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 15:21:14 -0500
Cc: Subranshu Patel <spatel.ml@xxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <51573461.8070006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <CAEUQceh-Xcabr0KErxF6EAdafDDP1PY_AeHwgYB82QeUdyGp-g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5147E360.10605@xxxxxxxxxxx> <5148037B.5010706@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (sfid-20130319_091205_759083_BA6F1AD2) <201303190924.29362.Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <51483A7D.9050202@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5156DF72.1090703@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5157237A.40006@xxxxxxxxxxx> <51573461.8070006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4
On 3/30/13 1:52 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 3/30/2013 12:40 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> On 3/30/13 7:49 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>> Ok, so here's the skinny on the source of our confusion WRT how/when
>>> EXT4 replays journals, and it's rather interesting.  Ted Ts'o explained
>>> the following.
>> Where was this, out of curiosity?
> Private email exchange with Ted.  I thought it was best from an
> etiquette standpoint not to wholesale paste his two private emails to
> the XFS list, but to summarize.  Maybe it would be ok if I put it on my
> web server for a couple of days then remove it.

I didn't need it verbatim, just wondered.  I agree, private emails
probably should stay that way, w/o permission otherwise.


> http://www.hardwarefreak.com/ext4-journaling.txt

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>