xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Announce re-factor all current xfstests patches request

To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Announce re-factor all current xfstests patches request
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 11:35:47 +1100
Cc: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20130327214804.GA28143@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <5152F2BB.4000709@xxxxxxx> <20130327134606.GJ5861@xxxxxxxxx> <20130327205407.GU6369@dastard> <20130327214804.GA28143@xxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 05:48:04PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 07:54:07AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > 
> > Support for named tests have not yet been added. From the check
> > script:
> > 
> > SUPPORTED_TESTS="[0-9][0-9][0-9] [0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]"
> 
> Ah, I thought support for named tests was there.  For right now,
> though, if we have test ext4/123 and btrfs/123, that's OK and they are
> considered separate tests, right?  Or do we still need to keep the
> numbers unique for now?

Test numbers within a subdir are unique. So yes, ext4/123 and
btrfs/123 are recognised as different tests.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>