xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Announce re-factor all current xfstests patches request

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Announce re-factor all current xfstests patches request
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:48:04 -0400
Cc: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@xxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20130327205407.GU6369@dastard>
References: <5152F2BB.4000709@xxxxxxx> <20130327134606.GJ5861@xxxxxxxxx> <20130327205407.GU6369@dastard>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 07:54:07AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> 
> Support for named tests have not yet been added. From the check
> script:
> 
> SUPPORTED_TESTS="[0-9][0-9][0-9] [0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]"

Ah, I thought support for named tests was there.  For right now,
though, if we have test ext4/123 and btrfs/123, that's OK and they are
considered separate tests, right?  Or do we still need to keep the
numbers unique for now?

                                                - Ted

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>