| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | xfstests should still make xfs as default? |
| From: | Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:32:32 -0300 |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Hi, working on xfstests after its new directory structures I noticed we should use now something like: ./check xfs/<test> to run some tests, IMHO this is not intuitive and I was working on a patch to make us able to use something just like the old way: ./check <test> But, since xfstests is becoming more generalist than xfs specific, I wonder if we should still keep xfs as default. What you guys think? I'll work on a patch to keep it as default or at least giving a suggestion on how to call a specific test in the new way. Cheers -- Carlos |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | FW: צימר איכותי במחיר עממי - פוריה עילית, ענבל |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Announce re-factor all current xfstests patches request, Zach Brown |
| Previous by Thread: | FW: צימר איכותי במחיר עממי - פוריה עילית, ענבל |
| Next by Thread: | [TPHCM] Co hoi song va lam viec tai My - tu van mien phi, [SGVisa] |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |