| To: | Jan Schmidt <list.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: add execution of a custom command to fsstress (-x and -X options) |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Mar 2013 06:50:54 +1100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1363863585-25598-1-git-send-email-list.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1363863585-25598-1-git-send-email-list.xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:59:45AM +0100, Jan Schmidt wrote: > From: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > This patch adds execution of a custom command in the middle of all fsstress > operations. Its intended use is the creation of snapshots in the middle of a > test run. Why do you need fsstress to do this? Why can't you just run fsstress in the background and run a loop creating periodic snapshots in the control script? Also, did you intend that every process creates a snapshot? i.e. it looks lik eif you run a 1000 processes, they'll all run a snapshot operation at X operations? i.e. this will generate nproc * X snapshots in a single run. This doesn't seem very wise to me.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | THE NEW APPLE iPHONE 5/64GB, SPECIAL! SPECIAL!! SPECIAL!!! |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: add execution of a custom command to fsstress (-x and -X options), Jan Schmidt |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] xfstests: add execution of a custom command to fsstress (-x and -X options), Jan Schmidt |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: add execution of a custom command to fsstress (-x and -X options), Jan Schmidt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |