Yep sorry. I figure its always a race in numbers do I don't bother with fixing
them up. Should I?
On Mar 15, 2013, at 5:16 AM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 02:01:58PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> Run basic btrfs information commands in various ways, performing
>> sanity tests of: filesystem show, label, sync, and device stats
>> (sync is included just because it's simple). These are mostly
>> just smoke tests, although for example show by label & UUID
>> should verify that the correct fs was shown.
>> This also adds quite a few new filters to accommodate the output
>> of the new commands.
>> Cc: linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> V2: sort & uniq device stats output to account for variable
>> nrs. of devices. Optionally check that the proper nr. of
>> devices was returned, as well.
>> V3: _filter_uuid needs to pay attention to $1, not hope
>> that the caller has set $UUID. Oops.
>> V4: fix stats filter to set UNIQ_OPT in both cases, ugh.
> Something I just noticed in this commit:
>> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
>> +. ./common.rc
>> +. ./btrfs.filter
> That should probably have been named "common.filter.btrfs".
> I found this updating my patchset that moves all the common.* files
> into a common/ directory....
> I'll rename it to common/filter.btrfs....
> Dave Chinner
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html