xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 0/3] xfstests patches

To: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] xfstests patches
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:43:50 +1100
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <514205DC.9040902@xxxxxxx>
References: <1363186623-1378-1-git-send-email-sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> <514205DC.9040902@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:16:12PM -0500, Rich Johnston wrote:
> On 03/13/2013 09:57 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >2 pretty simple ones, and a new btrfs test
> >
> >[PATCH 1/3] xfstests: add 274 to the prealloc group
> >[PATCH 2/3] xfstests: keep newlines out of SCRATCH_DEV_POOL
> >[PATCH 3/3] xfstests: btrfs tests for basic informational commands
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >xfs mailing list
> >xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
> >
> 
> This series has been committed.

Rich, can you please be careful to check the test numbers being used
in patches that are sent to the list before you commit them?

> >[PATCH 3/3] xfstests: btrfs tests for basic informational commands

This test was numbered 313, and so now we have tests 001-306 and 313
in the repository.  I noticed that Another of Eric's recent patches
is numbered 315, so it will also need renumbering before commit.

-Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>