xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ASSERT failure] transaction reservations changes bad?

To: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ASSERT failure] transaction reservations changes bad?
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 23:05:45 +1100
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <513F17F3.1010204@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20130312062001.GJ21651@dastard> <20130312062531.GK21651@dastard> <513EE274.6090808@xxxxxxxxxx> <20130312103138.GN21651@dastard> <513F0C07.1060000@xxxxxxxxxx> <513F17F3.1010204@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 07:56:35PM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote:
> More info, 3.7.0 is the oldest kernel on my environment, I ran into the
> same problem.

Thanks for following up so quickly, Jeff. So the problem is that a
new test is tripping over a bug that has been around for a while,
not that it is a new regression.

OK, so I'll expunge that from my testing for the moment as I don't
ahve time to dig in and find out what the cause is right now. If
anyone else wants to.... :)

Cheers,

Dave.

-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>