xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS filesystem corruption

To: stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: XFS filesystem corruption
From: Julien FERRERO <jferrero06@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 10:25:13 +0100
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=UwRG4UhdAuwVIB4HAsa+vsifzmDz0VJiSDNXgZGAM0I=; b=sQLhkzfueKn9ZHzlBGd8SV8kdA+Nr1EKWvS4blkatFNAEJYbERJXSmwCrbL154Kwb5 Z38MY25JWtQfVZdiFBfKqb6I/RlsgryaBWRoncin0+96UqWsDinpaZnjOVZ0JcwlOT/6 SKyfnVnxory2n3d1rTCEztRx0cfRPXuMJcNhAKzm9CHtmV5UGab0qnwlMHoD8M2QYqhf 3erftsXqB4oBsBhQ1REhxHzFtGd4xzownJTv+O9mqSyyurVPff8CVpVJsLXXXnJ+5ZND HfTPx5iTIBLQRhKs9hfuG++ODeBOKvGZEma6IF55IUMhJDXiR4Td0mNhdPAPGbt3APKz JPpg==
In-reply-to: <513D1D51.7010905@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <CAPcwv6wZJSBtgF-L6KNSn6N6Y+wUZJFXdbcg+zYRwoaB2sDdjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130306161519.2c28d911@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAPcwv6wqv0b_CPqDpBfOwVDg23uBi=tpGQSy9XuH2uWS5oVMWQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130306232100.6286f640@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5137CD46.6070909@xxxxxxxxxx> <5139A3B6.3040805@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5139D792.4090304@xxxxxxxxxx> <513A350A.508@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130309091152.GH23616@dastard> <513B84AD.2000603@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130310224536.GK23616@dastard> <513D1D51.7010905@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Ok, see, this is odd part here.  The OP didn't seem to have this
> metadata corruption issue with the old 2.6.18 kernel, at least I think
> that's the one he mentioned.  Then he switched to 2.6.35.  IIRC there
> were a number of commits around that time and some regressions.  I also
> recall 2.6.35 is not a long term stable kernel.  I'd guess there were
> reasons for that.  So, I'm wondering if there was a bug/regression
> relating to XFS metadata in 2.6.35 corrected in .36 or later and simply
> not backported.  Seems to ring a bell, vaguely.  I have no idea
> where/how to search for such information.
>

That is the main reason I asked. I google for regression / issue with
XFS in 2.6.35 but I didn't find anything. My hope was that someone
from this mailing list would remember it (if such a regression did
exist of course).

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>