Re: XFS filesystem corruption

[Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 3/7/13 7:04 AM, Julien FERRERO wrote:
>> It may be unrelated to your corruption, problem but I'm curious why you
>> are specifying a 32MB log section instead of letting mkfs.xfs make the
>> log size decision.
> 
> I honestly don' know, the rebuild script was written 8 years ago by an
> engineer that since left the company.
> 
> Is 32MB a short log space for a 1.5 TB of data ?

$ mkfs.xfs -dfile,name=fsfile,size=1536g
meta-data=fsfile                 isize=256    agcount=4, agsize=100663296 blks
         =                       sectsz=512   attr=2, projid32bit=0
data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=402653184, imaxpct=5
         =                       sunit=0      swidth=0 blks
naming   =version 2              bsize=4096   ascii-ci=0
log      =internal log           bsize=4096   blocks=196608, version=2
         =                       sectsz=512   sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none                   extsz=4096   blocks=0, rtextents=0


Default would be 768M w/ current xfsprogs.

So I'd say yes it's short.  You might do well to re-examine any old, crufty
"engineer left a while ago" tunings.  Defaults are defaults for a reason,
if you don't know why you're tuning something it may well be the wrong
choice.

-Eric