| To: | Pascal <pa5ca1@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Maximum file system size of XFS? |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 09 Mar 2013 19:10:06 -0600 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20130309233940.3b7c0910@thinky> |
| References: | <20130309215121.0e614ef8@thinky> <513BB7C3.4050009@xxxxxxxxxx> <20130309233940.3b7c0910@thinky> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130216 Thunderbird/17.0.3 |
On 3/9/13 4:39 PM, Pascal wrote: > Hello Ric, > > thank you for your answer. I am aware that there is a difference > between the maximum size under practical conditions and the theoretical > maximum. But I am looking for this theoretical number to use in within > in my thesis comparing file systems. A thesis comparing actual scalability would be much more interesting than one comparing, essentially, the container size chosen for a disk block. One could quickly write a filesystem which "can" be as large as a yottabyte, but it wouldn't really *mean* anything. -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfstests: 302: cross-subvolume sparse copies on btrfs, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS filesystem corruption, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Maximum file system size of XFS?, Pascal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Maximum file system size of XFS?, Stan Hoeppner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |