xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] Fix typo from commit 0c5e67e4 "xfstests 273: fix a typo"

To: rjohnston@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix typo from commit 0c5e67e4 "xfstests 273: fix a typo"
From: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 08:56:34 -0600
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, shhuiw@xxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20130307124125.435047948@xxxxxxx>
References: <20130307124102.821208303@xxxxxxx> <20130307124125.435047948@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120122 Thunderbird/9.0
On 03/07/13 06:41, rjohnston@xxxxxxx wrote:
When updating the patch, the redirect was incorrect.

Reported-by: Wang Sheng-Hui<shhuiw@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rich Johnston<rjohnston@xxxxxxx>

---

  273 |    2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: b/273
===================================================================
--- a/273
+++ b/273
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ _porter()
                exit
        fi

-       cp -r $SCRATCH_MNT/origin $SCRATCH_MNT/sub_$_suffix>$seq.full 2>>&1
+       cp -r $SCRATCH_MNT/origin $SCRATCH_MNT/sub_$_suffix>>$seq.full 2>&1
        if [ $? -ne 0 ]
        then
                echo "_porter $_suffix not complete"



The original patch looked okay:

   http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-02/msg00518.html

Should the bad patch be reverted and the original one put in?

--Mark.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>