| To: | Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: don't assume that falloc_punch implies falloc in test 255 |
| From: | Rich Johnston <rjohnston@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 5 Mar 2013 13:07:56 -0600 |
| Cc: | <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1362506382-26974-1-git-send-email-tytso@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1362506382-26974-1-git-send-email-tytso@xxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1 |
This patch has been committed.
Thanks
--Rich
commit 864688d368d6781c3f6d60bc55b5e3591953e462
Author: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue Mar 5 17:59:42 2013 +0000
xfstests: don't assume that falloc_punch implies falloc in test 255
As of Linux 3.9-rc1, ext4 will support the punch operation on file
systems using indirect blocks, but it can not support the fallocate
operation (since there is no way to mark a block as uninitialized
using indirect block scheme). This caused test 255 to fail, since it
only used _require_xfS_io_falloc_punch assuming that all file systems
which supported punch can also support fallocate. Fix this.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: don't assume that falloc_punch implies falloc in test 255, Rich Johnston |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH V3] xfstests: don't remove trailing zeros from integers, Eric Whitney |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: don't assume that falloc_punch implies falloc in test 255, Rich Johnston |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests: don't assume that falloc_punch implies falloc in test 255, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |