xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

[PATCH] xfstests: don't assume that falloc_punch implies falloc in test

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PATCH] xfstests: don't assume that falloc_punch implies falloc in test 255
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 12:59:42 -0500
Cc: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
As of Linux 3.9-rc1, ext4 will support the punch operation on file
systems using indirect blocks, but it can not support the fallocate
operation (since there is no way to mark a block as uninitialized
using indirect block scheme).  This caused test 255 to fail, since it
only used _require_xfS_io_falloc_punch assuming that all file systems
which supported punch can also support fallocate.  Fix this.

Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
---
 255 | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/255 b/255
index 0083963..ae1d8e0 100755
--- a/255
+++ b/255
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ _supported_fs generic
 _supported_os Linux
 
 _require_xfs_io_falloc_punch
+_require_xfs_io_falloc
 _require_xfs_io_fiemap
 
 testfile=$TEST_DIR/255.$$
-- 
1.7.12.rc0.22.gcdd159b

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>