On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 11:09:22PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am Mon, 4 Mar 2013 13:05:23 -0800
> schrieb Joel Becker <jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > > Really, xfstests is not designed for testing cluster filesystems in
> > > clustered environments. If we really want to support clustered
> > > filesystems and cluster wide operations, then we need to think
> > > about how to architect multi-host support into xfstests sanely.
> > > Clustered filesystems are not the only people that could make use of
> > > such functionality (NFS and CIFS come to mind).... ;)
> >
> > I'm much happier with the "check for other cluster mounts" approach
> > rather than avoiding fsck entirely. We like xfstests in the local or
> > single-node cases to behave exactly as one would expect.
> >
> > We do run xfstests on multiple nodes in a cluster, but by hand and
> > with our own cleanup. Obviously support for automating that would be
> > awesome :-)
>
> Can you share your cleanup code?
It's not code, unless you count DNA and neuron connections...
Joel
>
> Thanks,
> //richard
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Life's Little Instruction Book #139
"Never deprive someone of hope; it might be all they have."
http://www.jlbec.org/
jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx
|