[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] Do not check ocfs2

To: Joel Becker <jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not check ocfs2
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 23:09:22 +0100
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20130304210522.GA7783@localhost>
References: <1362269150-21478-1-git-send-email-richard@xxxxxx> <20130303011917.GI23616@dastard> <20130303100254.500b076f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5133C900.9050300@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20130303231905.0efd6d08@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5133D15A.9010600@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20130303235341.7470085e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5133D573.3050106@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20130304004229.GK23616@dastard> <20130304210522.GA7783@localhost>
Am Mon, 4 Mar 2013 13:05:23 -0800
schrieb Joel Becker <jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > Really, xfstests is not designed for testing cluster filesystems in
> > clustered environments. If we really want to support clustered
> > filesystems and cluster wide operations, then we need to think
> > about how to architect multi-host support into xfstests sanely.
> > Clustered filesystems are not the only people that could make use of
> > such functionality (NFS and CIFS come to mind).... ;)
> I'm much happier with the "check for other cluster mounts" approach
> rather than avoiding fsck entirely.  We like xfstests in the local or
> single-node cases to behave exactly as one would expect.
> We do run xfstests on multiple nodes in a cluster, but by hand and
> with our own cleanup.  Obviously support for automating that would be
> awesome :-)

Can you share your cleanup code?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>