xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 08/10] xfstest: add fallocate/punch_hole vs AIO/DIO stress te

To: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] xfstest: add fallocate/punch_hole vs AIO/DIO stress test
From: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 11:50:09 -0600
Cc: <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1361356935-29153-9-git-send-email-dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1361356935-29153-1-git-send-email-dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx> <1361356935-29153-9-git-send-email-dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1
On 02/20/2013 04:42 AM, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
Run  random AIO/DIO activity (fio's job:direct_aio_raicer)
random fallocate activity(fio's job:falloc_raicer)
and random punch_hole activity(punch_hole_raicer) on a common
file in parallel. If race exist old dio request may rewrite
punched block after it was allocated to another file, we will
catch that by verifier fio's job: "aio-dio-verifier".

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good.

Reviewed-by: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@xxxxxxx>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [PATCH 08/10] xfstest: add fallocate/punch_hole vs AIO/DIO stress test, Rich Johnston <=