[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Consistent throughput challenge -- fragmentation?

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Consistent throughput challenge -- fragmentation?
From: Brian Cain <brian.cain@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:18:19 -0600
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=tGlv/dXqf1we/LPhGRiBxCf/XYYrEFpDcrMeA4rOTQ0=; b=Hd8TsagEYHZ9uIkCSJJXR6F4t5+v7h1n+8Z/dfrjKoRKnumXmyCAJKEnBD7Xv7tyOQ arM+1t/TV0JTZlSHN6+EyK2xjQ9x+JaTonxPlIaDieoLltWotiqcKIiMxo1Fhb3lYck5 w2QNOJoqYR/3i3GeSHPCRgY4hqShZJg0eb23RMLhfErESDopZ/AzSSPiDfNn58wYgXak yxXCDUFi2AGnA9GF4BvnYxlY/I8HMwiE3nQKXcyWdMokxfAPl8XrSAom1RsTlT3zvrAJ fYUIVFePWgUv+jn3XQHRSF19dU542baxqAcJvRjiBiU+9DCmh7XYR5iD5K3CitKdkBi6 CgwQ==
In-reply-to: <20130225221639.GJ5551@dastard>
References: <CAEWpfG_DKJt1MmWS1tARH4OmYwpSt=A-DzwKkGcD67LuR6k=Bg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20130225221639.GJ5551@dastard>
Here's the info from the FAQ, I'll bundle up the benchmarks.

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:01:53AM -0600, Brian Cain wrote:
> All,
> I have been observing some odd behavior regarding write throughput to an
> XFS partition (the baseline kernel version is  I see
> consistently high write throughput (close to the performance of the raw
> block device) to the filesystem immediately after a mkfs, but after a few
> test cycles, there is sporadic poor performance.
> The test mechanism is like so:
> [mkfs.xfs <blockdev>] (no flags/options, xfsprogs ver 3.1.1-0.1.36)
> ...
> 1. remove a previous test cycle's directory
> 2. create a new directory
> 3. open/write/close a small file (4kb) in this directory
> 4. open/read/close this same small file (by the local NFS server)
> 5. open[O_DIRECT]/write/write/write/.../close a large file (anywhere from
> ~100MB to 200GB)
> Step #5 contains the high-throughput metrics which becomes an order of
> magnitude worse several test cycles after a mkfs.  Omitting steps 1-3 does
> not show the poor performance behavior.
> Can anyone provide any suggestions as to an explanation for the behavior or
> a way to mitigate it?  Running xfs_fsr didn't seem to improve the results.
> I'm happy to share benchmarks, specific results data, or describe the
> hardware being used for the measurements if it's helpful.

Post your benchmark script, along with the results you see, and all
the other information listed here:



Dave Chinner


Attachment: xfs_support_info.txt
Description: Text document

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>